February 25, 2000


I'd like to discuss a new chronic affliction:

Cartless Shopper's Arm
I'm u
sually hit hardest in book and music stores.
It start
s like this:
I wa
ltz into a book/record store,
Convi
nced that I am only browsing...
Thr
ee hours later, I shift a heavy armload of merchandise
to the one arm
not Completely Drained of Blood,
an
d when I open up the previously victimized arm from
the awkward, merchandise-carrying angle it had been in,
an acute blast of pain courses
throughout my forearm.
Nearly all o
f my money later,
I limp out of the book/record store with a bag
full
of goodies and a sore arm.
Tough br
eak.
Consumerism a
in't the easy thang it's cracked up to be.
I went up
North this past weekend via Train... got a real
good look at Californ
ia's belly -- all the massive amounts of
farms and fi
elds and whatnot...
I realized that
cows resemble fleas,
the way they spread across gree
n pastures,
feedi
ng off the earth's scalp.. but y'know..
they've got r
eally cute little noses that move around
the ground, snuffling for foo
d, and they lift their
muzzles into
the air, licking their chops and gazing at you
with
warm, wet mammal eyes...
Also, from the train you ca
n see into the backyards
and alleyw
ays
and Little For
bidden Niches
and
I noticed that some warehouses keep illegal tigers
as guard dogs. The
jungle cats have these sad, dirty faces.

In other ne
ws of things that disgust me,
ther
e's this little sick Proposition
floating around Cali
fornia voter ballots about now.
It'
s the Knight Proposition -- Prop. 22,
which essenti
ally states that Marriage shall be
between a man and
a woman in California... nothing new.
However, it's
blossomed into this big, stinkin' ordeal.
Right Wing
ers have these commercials out where schoolkids
chant
robotically "We want to protect marriage!" And
all
over Los Angeles, I see banners going up in support of
the damn thing
.
The opposition h
as not organized well. The "No on Knight"
committee
has tried to put out scare tactics, claiming
that this prop. will inte
rfere with the lives of gay couples
and deny them certain rights, and all kinds of outrageous
things that
.. that just aren't true.
The reas
on we should all

No on Proposition 22

is that it's stupid to vote in favor of something
that doesn't change anything.
See,
Peter Knight is this dullard politician who can't
com
e to grips with the fact that his son is gay.
Instea
d of talking to his kid or going into therapy
or... fucking dealing wi
th it....
he's dra
fted this little number and too many people
are takin
g it seriously.
I
n an era where we should be getting over old and silly
prejudices agai
nst other races and sexual orientations,
we should be
voting towards things which enable
gay marriages, not those which discriminate.
Nobody wants their right to marry the person they love
Controlled by their goddamn state,
why continue to inflict that on homosexuals?
Besides, it'
s counter-constitiutional.
We're mov
ing ever closer to state control,
ladies and gentlemen.
..that terrifies me.
Historical
ly, nothing but grand old travesties like
Jim Crow Law
s
come of that f
orm of government.

In any case, a
good friend aptly pointed out that in a society
tha
t produces Television shows like "How to Marry a Millionaire",
it's pre
tty fucking hypocritical to suddenly pretend that marriage
is this Sac
red Institution we must protect against those
Sinfu
l Homosexuals.
Ano
ther friend suggested a good commercial about the
w
hole prop.22 ordeal would be this:
A gay couple is shown kissing/fondling intimately.
A
regular joe kinda guy steps in front of the camera, scowling.
He gestu
res to the couple and says, "Them there's faggots!"
H
e shoots them.
A b
anner comes up: Yes on Prop 22.



Go Home













The Servants are toiling under the hot sun, ensuring this page gets better for you.
Make friends at
Silence Bellows@yahoo.com
Come back and collect your lost marbles...



Little Know-It-Alls





Things Fall Apart, the center will not hold.

OmniUpdate